Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Research in cognitive diagnostic models has increased over the past several years as demand for formative fine-grained assessment has grown. Theoretically, CDMs can provide this kind of feedback in a way that other models cannot. However, there has been limited research examining how known challenges to measurement impact CDM outcomes. While previous examinations of DIF in CDMs has focused on parameter recovery, none have examined the impact of DIF of CDM outcomes. In this paper, we provide initial findings examining this impact on classification accuracy at the level of individual attributes and attribute profiles. Initial findings suggest that CDMs are robust at the individual attribute level to DIF, while the attribute profiles are much less robust.
Justin Paulsen, Indiana University - Bloomington
Montserrat Beatriz Valdivia, Indiana University - Bloomington
Dubravka Svetina Valdivia, Indiana University - Bloomington
Yanan Feng, McKinsey & Company