Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Nested data structure and missing data are common situations in social science. This study aimed to extend Grund, Lüdtke, & Robitzsch (2017) by investigating how the three multilevel based multiple imputation methods (namely joint modeling and fully conditional specification with manifest vs. latent means) handle nonnormal level 2 missingness as opposed to normal data while utilizing HLM as the analysis model rather than simplistic linear regression. The results demonstrated how these imputation methods were affected by sample size, and more importantly, their sensitivity to violation of normality at level 2. Even though the performances deteriorated across the board with nonnormal level-2 missingness, joint modeling outperformed the other two methods. Implications of these results for empirical researchers are discussed as well.