Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
In program evaluation, evaluating the treatment effect accurately is of most importance. In order to achieve the goal, random assignment is desirable, but in reality the randomization can be imperfect, in which case preexisting difference will exist between treatment conditions. Furthermore, there always will be measurement errors in pretest. These two factors can create serious challenges for evaluators to accurately gauge the treatment effect and the impacts of these factors are not well known. Thus, in this paper, we addressed how much bias occurs in estimating treatment effect when the random assignment is imperfect and when there is a measurement error in pretest in evaluation studies that use the pretest-and-posttest design.
Yasuo Miyazaki, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Akihito Kamata, Southern Methodist University
Kazuaki Uekawa, ICF International