Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This presentation shares core perspectives that motivate the fairness standards, i.e., that fairness is
• an integral concern in the validity of score Interpretations
• a fundamental principle underlying all steps in the assessment process
• not something you think about “after the fact.” You must build it in
• fundamental right of all Individuals and subgroups in the intended test population.
Based on this perspective, the overarching fairness standard is as follows:
All steps in the testing process, including test design, validation, development, administration, and scoring procedures, should be designed in such a manner as to minimize construct-irrelevant variance and to promote valid score interpretations for the intended uses for all examinees in the intended population.
This overall standard is organized into four clusters of specific standards:
• Test design, development, administration and scoring that minimize barriers to valid score Interpretations for the widest possible range of Individuals and relevant subgroups
• Validity of test score interpretations for intended uses for the intended examinee populations
• Accommodations to remove construct-irrelevant barriers
• Safeguards against inappropriate use
The presentation of the most relevant standards for research ends with implications for researchers’ development, selection and/or use of measures that can provide valid results for all subjects in the intended research population, including consideration of these questions:
• Has the range of intended research subjects been fully specified?
• Are the items and tasks appropriate for all intended subjects?
• Were the items reviewed and revised for potential sources of bias?
• Were the items and measure piloted with the full range of indivdiuals for which it is intended?
• Will accommodations be needed for some students? Are some scores accommodated?
• Do psychometric or other analyses support the fairness of the measure? The validity of the accommodations?