Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This article examines the student teaching evaluation instrument used in a teacher preparation program at a mid-size public university. To determine the instrument’s validity and reliability, we used an exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling approach (ESEM) to study three years of responses from cooperating teachers, university supervisors, and student teachers. Findings confirm the validity and reliability of the instrument and indicate that the thirty competencies of the instrument comprise an invariant structure of four domains: onstage teaching, planning, assessment, and professionalism. Implications include possible revision of the instrument, the need for rater training, and the role of alignment.
Sarah Hylton, The College of William & Mary
Thomas Joseph Ward, College of William and Mary
Christopher R. Gareis, College of William and Mary
Jacob David Joseph, College of William and Mary