Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Session Type: Invited Speaker Session
Weis and Fine developed critical bifocality to reflect a dedicated theoretical and methodological commitment that documents at once the historic and contemporary linkages and capillaries of structural arrangements and the discursive practices by which those on the ground in schools and communities make sense of their circumstances. Critical bifocality offers a way to think about epistemology, design, and the politics of educational research in light of new forms of macro-level structural dynamics associated with the refractive implications of globalization and neo-liberalism, in this case, in the U.S., a nation that is arguably, in terms of income inequality, the most unequal society in the world. Critical bifocality enables us to consider how researchers might account empirically for global, national and local transformations as produced, insinuated, embodied, and resisted by youth and adults trying to make sense of current educational and economic possibilities in massively shifting context.
In the tradition of DuBois and feminist Sandra Harding critical bifocality insists that practical questions be unpacked historically and epistemologically – where does this come from and how do we know? - so that scholars may conceptualize and actualize this form of research while continuing to acknowledge that any move towards dogmatization of thought runs the risk of concretizing what must be continually challenged and unpacked in the current “post truth” context.
Michelle Fine, City College of New York - CUNY
James D. Anderson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Adam Gamoran, William T. Grant Foundation
Joyce E. King, Georgia State University
Rubén G. Rumbaut, University of California - Irvine
Terrenda Corisa White, University of Colorado-Boulder