Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Educators, scholars, and activists who oppose market-oriented education policies have recast the notion of ‘choice’ in education in support of community control and public investment policies. How do arguments that resist marketization and privatization by using the language of choice fit within the history of arguments over American education? The use of ‘choice’ language in opposition to market-oriented reforms can be understood as an effort to re-center the ‘liberation’ goal of education alongside historical goals of education that emphasize its ‘public’ benefits. I review and extend Labaree’s (1997) argument about the historical goals of American education, in order to present a framework that coherently situates anti-marketization arguments that use the language of ‘choice’ within the historical goals of American education.