Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Drawing from a science identity framework, this paper uses a sample of first-generation and continuing-generation doctoral students (n=111) in the biological sciences to compare D/discourses around becoming a scientist. Specifically, this qualitative study explores students’ expectations of their PI/faculty advisor and the role they might play in students’ science identity development. Findings suggest that expectations came from similar sources (prior research experience, lab interactions, and peers) and that both groups expected PIs to provide intellectual support and recognition of science identity. However, the utility of varying forms of PI support in developing a science identity and the meaning of specific supports (such as the meaning of the word ‘direction’) were perceived differently by first-generation vs. continuing-generation students.
Annie M. Wofford, Northern Arizona University
Kimberly Griffin, University of Maryland
Josipa Roksa, University of Virginia