Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper is based on a longitudinal study of 20 elementary (K-8) teachers, especially in their thirteenth year of teaching. All placed strong emphasis on teaching for relevance, giving a variety of reasons: e.g., student engagement; depth of real world understanding; and personal life development. They also described feasible strategies for teaching for relevance, despite current “cover and test” pressures. Some focused more on real-world understanding than way-of-life development. In this paper we discuss the need for a balance between these two types of relevance; and the importance of relevance of both kinds in providing a basis for students to construct knowledge that is useful across the whole of their life.
Clive M. Beck, OISE/University of Toronto
Clare Kosnik, University of Toronto/OISE
Yiola Cleovoulou, University of Toronto
Mira Gambhir, Branksome Hall
Saewan Koh, University of Toronto
Belinda Monique Longe, Toronto District School Board
Shelley Murphy, OISE/University of Toronto
Elizabeth Rosales, University of Toronto - OISE
Kirsten Tenebaum, OISE/University of Toronto