Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In this philosophical essay, I aimed to explore how the logic of policy engineering drives the purpose of educational leadership. I draw from Tosas (2016), Ball (1995, 2003), Marcuse (1991), and Arendt(1958) to show how current policy discourses are shaped by technologies of management, which is restricting possibilities for educational leadership.I first present three different policy conceptualizations and how these conceptualizations construct the purpose of leadership and subject of leaders in policy implementation. Second, using the idea of Stephen J. Ball’s (1995) policy engineering and Harbert Marcuse’s (1991) one-dimensional thinking, I argue that the technologies of constructing subjectivity bind educational leadership within a management framework. Third, explore possible creativity for school leaders within interactions between leadership and policy.