Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Creativity has been well studied in the past several decades, and numerous measures have been developed to assess creativity. However, validity evidence associated with each measure is often mixed. In particular, the social consequence aspect of validity has received little attention. This is partly due to the difficulty of testing for differential item functioning (DIF) within the classical test theory framework, which still remains the most popular approach to assessing creativity. Hence, this study provides an example of examining DIF using multilevel explanatory item response models. The Creative Thinking Scale was tested for DIF in a sample of 1,043 10th-12th graders. Results revealed significant uniform and non-uniform DIF for some items. The detailed implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.
Meihua Qian, Clemson University
Shenghai Dai, Washington State University - Pullman
Xianyong Wang, Clemson University