Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Program coherence is highly prized as an element of high-quality leadership preparation programs. This paper is a self-study of the UCEA Program Design Network’s Curriculum, Instruction, and Coherence Networked Improvement Community (CIC-NIC). Through the application of improvement science principles and approaches, we identified faculty engagement as a critical feature of moving our programs towards coherence. We also found that our role as boundary spanners was critical to engaging other faculty to join in efforts to address program coherence, but that the ability to serve a boundary spanning function hinged critically on our own positioning within our program. This led us to redefine program coherence in dynamic and developmental terms, rather than as a static feature of high-quality leadership preparation programs.
David H. Eddy-Spicer, University of Virginia
Sara L. Dexter, University of Virginia
Jacqueline Gonzalez, Fordham University
Sonya Diana Hayes, The University of Tennessee - Knoxville
Thomas Ramming, University at Buffalo - SUNY
Matthew Scott Richardson, University of Virginia
Corrie Stone-Johnson, University at Buffalo - SUNY
Pamela D. Tucker, University of Virginia
Sheneka M. Williams, Michigan State University