Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
State-level community college governance structures have increasingly become centralized, both through formal authority and funding, as policymakers have increasingly pursued higher education governance reform. This two-way, fixed effects analysis examines the relationship between local appropriations and community college state governance structures while taking into account their moderating impact and controlling for state-level factors. We find a relationship between local appropriations and states with no formal coordinating authority and that this absence moderates the relationship between unemployment and appropriations. Based on our findings, resisting centralization efforts might be to the financial benefit of community colleges; however, this does not consider the impacts varying degrees of centralization might have on stakeholders outside of the local appropriations process.
Lindsey Hammond, University of Georgia
Sean Baser, University of Georgia
Alexander Cassell, The Pennsylvania State University - University Park