Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
We observe pre-service teachers’ (PST; N = 59) metacognitive monitoring strategies during fraction magnitude comparison tasks. PSTs were randomly assigned to either the Correct Examples (CE) condition (complete explanations to study) or the Defining Features (DF) condition (a checklist of steps required in a complete explanation). PSTs explained their reasoning before and after studying the CE or DF scaffolds, and reflected on differences between their initial explanations and those displayed in the different conditions. The current study assesses whether PSTs successfully detect mistakes, omissions, or ambiguities in their own initial explanations and whether their reflections vary by condition. Suggestions are made on providing PSTs with opportunities to support their conceptual understanding of fractions and their explanations of mathematics content.