Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this study was to investigate teachers’ perceptions of three strategies for analyzing feedback on students’ performance to guide improvements in instruction. These strategies include: (1) formative assessment error analysis, (2) mastery charts of class progress on formative assessments, and (3) summative assessment results comparisons with previously taught classes. Self-report survey responses from 92, K-12 teachers involved in a pilot mastery learning program revealed they consistently rate the tallies of student errors on formative assessments as most useful in planning corrective instruction and in making instructional improvements. The mastery charts and summative assessment results are considered more useful in evaluating the overall effectiveness of mastery learning and making changes in implementation procedures. Implications for program implementation are discussed.