Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper reads the “Teaching hard history” curriculum against Kumashiro’s (2000) advocacy for a post-structuralist anti-bias education. It argues that the curriculum frameworks’ underlying conception of the past as static and discoverable contributes to its problematic positioning of teachers as both the problem with and solution to students’ inabilities to connect past injustices to current struggles. Furthermore, the paper suggests that moving towards a theory of anti-oppressive education may require both an attention to anti-oppressive pedagogy and a transformed notion of the past as dynamic and socially contingent, much like that which has emerged in memory studies.