Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Fractured purposes and inconsistent theories have defined the history of gifted education. This theoretical disharmony, coupled with insufficient teacher preparation, leads to the question of how teachers draw conclusions about what they believe giftedness is and how their beliefs affect instruction of advanced students. The current study explores teachers’ conceptions of giftedness using the three paradigms of gifted education using an explanatory sequential design to mixed methods that converges both quantitative and qualitative data (Creswell, 2015). Results of a piloted EFA indicated a four-factor structure of gifted paradigmatic beliefs; current analyses aims to run a multigroup confirmatory analysis with a teacher sample and conduct one-on-one interviews. Implications and suggestions for researchers, educators, and other educational stakeholders are discussed.
Kacey Crutchfield, University of North Texas
Jessica Ottwein, University of North Texas
Lindsay Ellis Lee, East Tennessee State University
Kendal Smith, University of North Texas
Jeb S Puryear, University of Montana
Anne N. Rinn, University of North Texas