Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In this paper we focus on two issues not commonly discussed together in the context of early childhood education, and that are perceived potentially risky topics: Love and touch. We argue that both are central concepts for early childhood education practitioners. Based on empirical research, we suggest that the moral panic regarding touch has led to a problematic perception of love and touch in early childhood education. By touch, educational institutions teach children something about who they are and what is their place in the world as loved or unloved. We argue that if educational practitioners recognize this, and consciously reflect their touching practices and whether these are loving, they can become more responsive educators.