Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In Finland, the role of parents in the education of their children has often been discussed in the past and today. In recent legislation on education, such as the curricula of basic education, co-operation between parents and schools is emphasized. (Finnish National Agency for Education 2016). Schools should act as the initiators of the cooperation but parents are considered to bear the main responsibility on their children’s socialization and education (cf. Böök & Perälä-Littunen 2015).
The Nordic welfare state is possible because of the trust between citizens (Bjørnskov, 2016). Trust in teachers’ professionalism has been one of the main features in Finnish educational system. Thus, teachers are quite independent at their work and can decide how to in practice organize cooperation with parents (Sormunen et al, 2018; Tirri, 2014). In a study focusing on teacher-students’ views on home-school cooperation, the interviewed expressed worries over their possibilities of cooperation but also concluded that they are professionals (Perälä-Littunen & Böök, 2019, cf. Baeck, 2010).
According to the previous literature, in addition to trust, democracy, equality, and participation are features espoused in the Nordic model of education (e.g. Imsen, Blossig, & Moos, 2017). The presentation is based on a review of the existing literature and an analysis of the Finnish curricula on basic education, 2014. The focus is on looking into the ways features of the Nordic model of education can be seen in the curricula. Features reflecting trust, equality and parents’ participation were searched for. For instance, trust appeared in the curricula in relation to trusting other people and developing students’ trust in their abilities.
References:
Baeck, U.- D. K. (2010). ‘We are the professionals’: A study of teachers’ views on parental involvement in school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(3). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425691003700565
Böök, M.L. and Perälä-Littunen, S. (2015). Responsibility in home-school relations – Finnish
parents’ views. Children & Society, 29(6), 615-625 DOI:10.1111/chso.12099
Bjørnskov, C. (2016). Tillid og velfærdsstaten. Tidsskriftet for proffesionsstudier, no. 22,
22–28. Risskov: Professionshøjskolen VIA University College.
Finnish National Agency for Education. (2014). National Core Curriculum for Basic
Education. https://www.ellibs.com/fi/book/9789521362590/national-core-curriculum-
for-basic-education-2014.
Imsen G, Blossing U and Moos L. (2016) Reshaping the Nordic education model in an era of
efficiency. Changes in the comprehensive school project in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden since the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1-16.
Ojakangas, M. (1997). Lapsuus ja auktoriteetti. Pedagogisen vallan historia Snellmanista
Koskenniemeen [Childhood and Authority. History of Pedagogical Power from
Snellman to Koskenniemi]. Helsinki:Tutkijaliitto.
Perälä-Littunen, S. and Böök, M.L. (2019). Finnish teacher-students’ views on home-school
cooperation. International Journal about Parents in Education, 11(1), 37- 45.
Sormunen, M., Kirilina, V., Goranskaya, S. and Tossavainen, K. (2018). Interaction between
home and school: The views of teachers and parents from Finland and Russia. International Journal about Parents in Education, 10(1), 33–46.
Tirri, K. (2014). The last 40 years in Finnish teacher education. Journal of Education and
Teaching 40(5), 600–609. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.956545