Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The necessity of teaching a written communication of mathematical problem-solving and reasoning is well documented in the state standards, yet there are still few studies that examine the effectiveness of the mathematical writing (MW) intervention in a validated way. This study shares the findings from the MW intervention which combined two instructional approaches, self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) and schema-based instruction (SBI), for 163 fourth-grade students. We used One-way mixed ANOVA to compare the effects of the intervention between a treatment and a control group. Students who were in the treatment group wrote better-structured mathematical texts, with a higher quality of mathematical reasoning. Outcomes for students with disabilities was mixed. Research and educational implications are discussed.