Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
For decades, post-secondary institutions have outsourced preservice teacher (PST) supervision to contingent faculty, ignored supervisors, and overlooked PST supervision in tenure and promotion decisions. Thus, PST supervision has become institutional service work. This case study used survey, interview, and document analysis to understand how supervisors and administrators in one teacher education department positioned supervisors’ work as service. The findings revealed that supervisors positioned their work as professional, financial, and emotional service, and the institution positioned supervisors’ work as service by providing no institutional rewards for supervising and expecting supervisors to enact roles not officially required of them. Study implications are that institutions should resist notions of supervision as service by acknowledging its complexity and provide commensurate compensation for supervisors.