Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Service-learning programs have been traditionally seen as instruments to bring together people whose lives are different. However, SL projects sometimes promote the idea that members of marginalized communities are ill-equipped to solve their problems; this reinforces the belief that wealthier people are saviors of poorer people. SL programs in Latin American elite schools, defined as those serving the wealthiest students, mostly focus on the needs and interests of their students; community voices are rarely heard. Communities only become instruments to benefit students from elite schools; this only exacerbates the us-them divide. Hence, I argue that in order for SL to accomplish its positive potential, schools have to design them following the precepts of community-based interventions.