Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study compared the analogical reasoning of three groups that differed in their creative expertise: professional actors, undergraduate acting majors, and non-actors. Using an Analogy Finding Task, in which participants identified valid and non-valid verbal analogies, three aspects of participants’ analogical reasoning were measured: the number of analogies participants selected as valid (Quantity), the rate of true-positive analogical identification (Sensitivity), and the rate of true-negative identification of non-valid analogies (Selectivity). The task was administered under both a baseline and a “think creatively” prompt. Actors (professional or student) were significantly more Sensitive to valid analogies than non-actors, and they were significantly more influenced by the “think creatively” prompt, which increased the Quantity, and decreased the Selectivity, of actors’ analogical reasoning.