Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Proximal processes that young children engage in with significant others in microsystems are engines of development. This study revisits this classic topic by focusing on complexity in within‐child configuration of positivities and negativities across proximal interpersonal processes in early childhood (i.e., mother-child, child care provider-child, and peer interactions at 6-36 months) and its implications for early adolescence adaptation (i.e., externalizing/internalizing problems, and social relationship quality at 6th grade). Latent profile analyses were conducted using NICHD SECCYD data (N = 1,364). Four profiles were identified: Single Risk with Mothers; Double Protection with Mothers and Child Care Providers; Double Risk with Child Care Providers and Peers; and Triple Risk with Mothers, Child Care Providers, and Peers. Early adolescence outcomes varied across profiles.