Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The current climate of school improvement (SI) planning is laden with tensions, leaving educators and leaders balancing accountability compliance, organizational improvement, and social justice agendas. We used a hermeneutic phenomenology methodology to uncover the ways in which educators and leaders experience and process these tensions in their own improvement planning. We found that school improvement plans are often written to comply with external accountability policies. As a counter narrative to compliance, educators and leaders often have both formal and informal SIP processes where informal planning is more growth-focused and individualized to school context, however, there remains a hesitancy in engaging families and communities in SI planning, limiting the use of SIP for social justice aims.