Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Employing chronotope (Bakhtin, 1981) and social tense (Povinelli, 2011), this study investigates how Korea is perpetually described as a danilminjok (one nation, one people/blood) nation in online English study group discussions. I conducted virtual ethnography of an English study group of Korean learners. This space is significant because both online and English mediums are often believed to encourage more diverse and cross-boundary thinking. In discussing Korea’s immigration and diversity, the members actively used the negative present tense to illustrate that Korea is “not ready” for immigrants on the ground that it lacks proper policies for existing immigrants in Korea. Deploying linguistic tenses this way has negative sociopolitical impacts on non-Korean populations in the country.