Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The study sought to understand how teacher educators can support teacher candidates’ development of pedagogical decision making. We describe how we used the “pedagogical judgement rubric” to assess candidates' teaching analysis assignments during their clinical experiences. We also discuss how the candidates’ pedagogical judgement was shaped by mediated interventions that were informed by the rubric’s criteria. The study revealed how a common, theory-guided framework provided a clear goal for teacher educators and candidates to work towards. The study also demonstrates the significance of using candidates’ previous work to revise assessments and support candidates’ capacity to achieve a more sophisticated analysis. The framework of “pedagogical judgement” can guide supported and structured clinical practice that enhances candidates’ pedagogical decision making.