Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The chief outcome of advocacy in gifted education is policy supporting identification and services for gifted education. Inequitable access remains a significant challenge to gifted education, yet little research has studied the impact of policy on equity/inequity in gifted education. Three studies of school districts (n=310, n=128, n=60) examined the mean Relative Difference in Composition Indices (RDCI) in states with and without gifted education policy mandates. Data across all three of the analyses suggest that state policy mandates in gifted education yield no effects on improved equity. Some analyses indicated school districts operating without state policy had more equitable RDCI than those with policies. More equity specific advocacy and equity policy studies are recommended.