Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Research on school turnaround has proliferated in the last twenty years. Related studies can largely be considered as either policy evaluations or case studies of principal action. This disconnect seems potentially inhibitive to learning what worked when, for whom, and why. To better understand this disconnect, we completed a systematic review of the turnaround literature to address how school turnaround has been conceptualized within policy and practice, primarily leadership, research, and the implications of these distinctions for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners. We found that policy studies excluded the role of the principal in any turnaround effort, while practice studies lacked causal warrants and generalizable applications. We conclude that there is little to no overlap between these two sets of studies.