Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Preparing autonomy-supportive teachers requires examining preservice teachers’ intentions to enact autonomy support in their future classrooms, and beliefs and motivations predicting the intentions. Combining perspectives from Self-Determination Theory and mindset theory, study 1 surveyed 237 preservice teachers from three universities. Autonomous orientation and growth mindset directly and/or indirectly predicted intentions to enact autonomy support through beliefs about autonomy support and intrinsic motivation for teaching. With interviews (N = 17) and field journals (N =103), study 2 investigated intentions to enact autonomy support and control in preservice teachers with growth, mixed, and fixed mindsets. Fixed mindset related more to control intentions, especially under “pressure from below.” Mindset extends understanding of autonomy support besides SDT’s explanations; reducing fixed mindset helps reduce control.