Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study compares IRT linking methods for the simple MIRT model and the bifactor model with mixed format tests. For the study, two different IRT linking methods are considered: linking without linking coefficient methods (concurrent calibration (CC) and fixed item parameter calibration (FIPC)). The simulation results were explored with two different linking methods depending on the multidimensional structures (simple MIRT and bifactor model), item type (only MC item and mixed format test), and degree of ability equivalence among groups. The CC and the FIPC linking methods well recovered the item parameters. For the bifactor model, the FIPC linking method recovered parameters well, especially the difficulty parameters, whereas the CC linking method performed well for the simple MIRT model.