Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the Trump administration unlawfully rescinded the 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy. DACA deferred deportation for nearly 900,000 school- or college-age undocumented immigrants who contributed significantly to the U.S. The case presents an opportunity to analyze the values underpinning DACA and its’ overall narrative. Using Critical Race Theory and UndocuCrit, we examine the amici briefs submitted to the Court to illuminate similar/different values, interests, and perspectives when stakeholders tell the DACA story. Preliminary analyses reveal the briefs tell a narrow story of DACA, focusing, on legal formalism and the contributions of DACA recipients. Overall, recipients’ stories are underemphasized. We discuss the significance for research, policy, and practice.