Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In the United Kingdom, large scale standardized assessments are continuously used by OFSTED as a measure of student success and educational leaders’ accountability. However, these assessment methods and accountability practices can contribute to the creation of inequitable conditions for disadvantaged and marginalized student populations. This case study explored which factors school leaders recognized as a barrier to their students’ academic success. The ten interviewed leaders raised three main themes. Firstly, leaders articulated how professional collaboration was hindered by the juxtaposition of distributed leadership and collaboration within a hierarchical, technocratic political system. Then, leaders raised the mismatch between governmental targets and funding for disadvantaged students. Finally, leaders demonstrated a continued use of standardized data despite recognizing its potential harms.