Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
To explore the impact of field experiences on prospective preservice teachers (PPTs), this study examined PPTs’ perceptions of their cooperating professionals’ (CP) teaching efficacy and technology use. Using latent profile analysis, we applied a person-centered approach to determine if profiles of PPTs existed. Second, we used a multinomial logistic regression to examine whether there were any antecedent factors that predicted profile membership. Results showed four profiles of PPTs: ML Experts, Low Non-Users, Chaotic Users, and Skilled Traditional users of technology. Results from regression analysis were mixed and largely nonsignificant, though PPTs with a desired certification level of grades 4-9 were significantly more likely to rate their CPs as Chaotic Users than PPTs with a desired certification of K-3.