Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Most accounts of educational leadership construct “bodyless” leaders. The taboo on documenting bodies in leadership, claims Sinclair (2005) serves to prevent discussions on gender and power: “If one is male, powerful and senior, then one is more likely to be portrayed as bodyless” (p. 390). Therefore, this paper draws upon an empirical study of leadership practice to show how principals and central office leaders use their bodies and bodily performances (e.g., language practices, gestures, gaze, facial expressions) to enact leadership. Findings from a five-month qualitative study suggest that educational leadership is gendered and bodily performances are entwined with the exercise of power. Future research on how physical aspects of leadership might reinforce gender norms and sustain inequity is suggested.