Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study examines the mechanisms and societal factors that support and inhibit the development of collective responsibility by looking at the ways Singapore, Finland, and Norway approach accountability and quality assurance as drivers of school improvement. A review of reform efforts in each system reveals the ways that Singapore invests in both individual accountability and collective responsibility, while Finland and Norway have focused primarily on developing the capacity for collective responsibility. Through an analysis of these different approaches, this study seeks to illuminate the ways in which the strengths and weaknesses of education systems and the efforts to improve them reflect their geographic, economic, political, and socio-cultural conditions.