Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Research shows that teacher education programs have not adequately addressed hatred and white supremacy. This paper reflects an inquiry into how teacher educators view the relationship between their formal and enacted curricula when addressing hatred and white supremacy with pre-service teachers. Through semi-structured interviews and analysis of syllabi and course materials provided by participants, the findings suggest that teacher educators generally either allowed their formal curriculum to deeply influence their enacted curriculum, or they viewed their formal curriculum as a guide for their enacted curriculum. Their personal philosophies, institutional norms, and career stages inform how they view the relationship between their formal and enacted curricula, and thus affect what their pre-service teachers learn about hatred and white supremacy.