Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study examined the appropriateness of using the fit indices cutoff criteria of measurement invariance testing derived in the context of structural equation modeling (SEM) (e.g., CFI change less than .01) for measurement invariance testing in exploratory SEM (ESEM). The design factors of this simulation study include model complexity, magnitude of cross-loadings, location of measurement noninvariance, proportion of items with measurement noninvariance, magnitude of measurement noninvariance, and sample size. The results indicated that when sample size was large (over 800 per group), the CFI criteria failed to detect a measurement noninvariance of .15, but successfully detected the measurement noninvariance of .30. AIC and BIC performed very well when sample size was relatively large.