Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this systematic review was to characterize the implementation of reliability generalization meta-analytic (RGM) practices within mathematics education-related empirical research. An exhaustive literature search was conducted to locate studies related to mathematics education. Of the RGM studies, 85.5% (N=9184) of the articles examined across studies had no mention of reliability or simply cited previously reported reliabilities. Of the 24 included studies, 5 (20.83%) applied a random effects model, 2 (8.33%) used a fixed effects model, and the majority (17 or 70.83%) did not indicate which model was applied in the meta-analysis. The results of the present study will impact future studies to support the efficacy of interventions in mathematics education by improving the reliability of study outcomes.