Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Should universities teach politically opposed students to learn from each other through dialogue? Critics assert that these conversations can blur important ethical distinctions and that protest, lawsuits, and elections are far more effective tools for advancing justice. Proponents of political dialogue suggest that it can improve and legitimize democratic decisions. Observations of university political dialogue programs and interviews with student participants reveal that these conversations may contribute a benefit that has not been highlighted by deliberative theory. What increased understanding may be best equipped to do is reveal the conceptions of the good that motivate views with which students disagree, which can cultivate acknowledgement of the people who hold those other views as legitimate co-creators of democratic society.