Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Teacher candidates (TCs) often struggle to parse complex classroom practices such as facilitating a discussion. Teacher educators (TEs) impose interpretive frameworks naming, or “problem-setting,” of the components, dilemmas, and aims of these practices, in order to influence how TCs notice and interpret classroom activity. This comparative case study uses interview and think-aloud data to ask how three social studies TEs articulate the pedagogical dilemmas of classroom discussion and to what extent their problem-setting is reflected in their students’ noticing. Findings suggest that TEs with shared perspectives on disciplinary discussion noticed different elements of discussion. TCs, as a group, tended to focus on non-disciplinary elements of videos, but when TCs did notice disciplinary elements of videos, their interpretations reflected their TE’s.