Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Prior studies have focused on how children understand irreducible fractions, where no common factor can be extracted (e.g., 2/3). Here, we investigate how people reason about reducible fractions (e.g., 4/6). Mathematics instruction emphasizes always reducing fractions to lowest terms. We predict, then, that adults will do so automatically. To test this prediction, we developed a new fraction span task where automatic reduction of reducible fraction is task-irrelevant, i.e., should hurt performance. We also adapted the fraction comparison task so that automatic reduction is task-relevant, i.e., should enhance performance by supporting the use of efficient componential strategies. Our study of undergraduate students found initial support for these prediction, suggesting that fraction instruction should stress the task-relevance of reducing reducible fractions.