Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study identifies influence tactics used by educational champions, school staff members who operate as in-house entrepreneurs and introduce a significant change into their schools. The study also examines targets’ perspectives on the influence tactics, and in particular their source of motivation for complying to the influence attempts. Semi-structured interviews have been conducted with principals, teachers and other school staff members to identify champions and their influence tactics. Five influence tactics surfaced from the interviews: pressure, exchange, persuasion, recruitment, and partnering, a tactic that expands the soft tactics repertoire. Analysis by self-determination theory explains a disparity in the interpretation given by champions and targets to tactics, when tactics undergo a modification towards the soft side and are experienced as softer.