A Call for Pluralism in "Post-Truth" Times: The Case of Value-Added Methodology

• In Event: Multiple Perspectives on Accountability in Schools

Abstract

During what many have named the “post-truth” era, it is an important time to consider how our research may better serve the public during these uncertain times. As such, this paper challenges the way that “truths” about education get produced, accepted and acted upon. Specifically, it will (1) chart the historical conditions that have made this movement possible, and (2) illustrate how such conditions have enabled one element of this discourse (value-added methodology) to maintain steady momentum in the American system, despite increasing academic and legal criticisms. Specifically, the purpose of this paper is to challenge the increasing acceptance of VAM methodology as a “truth” upon which to base not only policy and practice, but education research more broadly.

Authors

• Jessica Holloway, Deakin University

• Matthew Ryan Lavery, South Carolina Education Oversight Committee

• Audrey Amrein-Beardsley, Arizona State University