Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study investigates how elementary teachers’ perceptions and facilitation of scientific argumentation changed throughout their participation in the first year of a multi-year professional learning (PL) program. The PL emphasized a set of critical practices that foster argumentation in elementary science through a practice-based approach. Drawing from teacher surveys and classroom video recordings, results show changes in both teachers’ perceptions and facilitation of classroom argumentation. Interestingly, while the video recordings show that students gained proficiency in developing, evaluating and critiquing ideas and that there were significant changes in the teacher practices following the initial experiences of the PL, including the Summer Institute, no significant changes in the practices were observed in the video from the Fall to the Spring.
Matthew Wilsey, Stanford University
Coralie F Delhaye, Stanford University
Melissa Collins, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California - Berkeley
Sara Allan, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California - Berkeley
Emily V. Reigh, Stanford University
Hilda Borko, Stanford University
Jonathan F. Osborne, Stanford University