Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Learning Assistants (LAs) improve undergraduate students’ content understanding and satisfaction in high-stakes, introductory STEM courses. These ascribed ‘near peers’ are intrinsically motivated to proactively support undergraduate STEM learners through self-determined actions. However, if contextual factors of the classroom shift, such as abruptly transitioning from face-to-face to remote learning, it is unknown to what extent LAs’ self-determination is impacted. This research study explored 70 reflections penned from 13 LAs serving a Calculus II course at a large, research-oriented university in Spring of 2020 using the constructs of Self-Determination Theory. Results show reflections related to competence (-7%) and autonomy (-1%) decreased, whereas relatedness (8%) increased, suggesting specific areas of need for supporting LAs’ self-determination in times of rapid (i.e. course modality) transition.