Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study aims to further investigate the question of “can ordinal indicators be treated as continuous in SEM?”. We propose to conduct a Monte Carlo study to examine and compare the performance of ML, robust ML, DWLS, and ULS methods in analyzing SEM with ordinal indicators containing at least five response categories. The manipulated factors are model structure, number of response categories, distribution of ordinal indicators, similarity of distribution across ordinal indicators, and sample size. Results from preliminary analysis indicate that no one method outperform the other methods in terms of parameter and standard error estimates. All methods over-reject the true model based on chi-square test statistic, but rejection rates from ML methods are relatively small.