Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
For Perspectives, Modes of inquiry, Data sources/evidence, and Scholarly significance, please see above.
Purpose. This paper lays out the context for our endeavor, namely how the three-way partnership for leadership preparation between a high school district, a state agency, and a university came about. Baked into this description is an outlining of the supports that were afforded to us, both intentional and happenstance, that others may want to draw upon.
Substantiated conclusions. Mutuality is crucial to all partnerships; overlap in the motives of each potential partner must exist for this level of collaborative work to succeed. In this authentic partnership involving three institutional partners, reaching goal convergence was multifaceted. The district’s primary goal was to prepare the next generation of homegrown school leaders. The state agency held as primary the goal of building district-level capacity of engaging in continuous improvement to ultimately improve outcomes for LTELs. The university’s goal was to maximize its relevancy, currency, and community responsiveness, as well as increase the recruitment of potential candidates. Recognizing that all partners had different goals, the formation of the partnership was semi-organic and layered. To support the partnership and achievement of each partner’s respective goals, investments and distribution of resources were critical. As one partner stated, “Everyone has skin in the game.”