Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In the present study, we conduct a critical discourse analysis of teacher talk across important components of argument writing instruction to examine how the various discourses used to frame argument writing in elementary classrooms might expand or constrain opportunities for students to develop rhetorical agency. In this case study of a 5th grade classroom, we found that sociopolitical discourses, which frame writing as a situated, social act, were common during idea generation. However, during engagement with and production of texts (i.e., students putting their ideas to paper), discourses of ‘doing writing’ and school norms frame writing as a prescribed, neutral practice. We discuss the implications these framings may have for fostering students’ rhetorical agency.