Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Using a qualitative critical race policy analysis methodology, this paper examines the discursive practices leveraged to eliminate the RAZA MAS Ethnic Studies program—an initiative found to minimize disparities in educational outcomes across racial lines. Preliminary findings suggest proponents justified this policy by framing the RAZA MAS program and affiliates as a ‘threat’ to Arizona students and community members. Disguised in the language of ‘opportunity’ and ‘equity,’ political stakeholders employed race-neutral terminology to institutionalize injustice in Arizona public schools. These findings point to the deleterious power of ostensibly race-neutral policymaking processes in systemizing, sustaining, and extending racial injustice. These insights can inform justice-seeking policymaking processes that aim to support the liberation efforts of BIPOC students and their communities.